Watch World War I Unfold in a 6 Minute Time-Lapse Film: Every Day From 1914 to 1918īritish Actors Read Poignant Poetry from World War Iįrank W. Hardly a glorification, Hildebrand’s work seems to speak to what those of us now, one hundred years in the future, would come to see in World War I: its misery, its oppressive sense of futility, and the haunting destruction it left behind. Still, they give us a clearer idea of the situation than do most contemporary images. Though not himself a dyed-in-the-wool propagandist, he did need to pose the soldiers for these photos, due to the lack of a film sensitive enough to capture actual action. He’d already founded a color film society in his native Stuttgart three years before the Archduke’s assassination, and had tried his hand at autochrome printing as early as 1909. “ The overwhelming majority of photos taken during World War I were black and white,” writes Spiegel Online, where you can browse a gallery of eighteen of his photos, “lending the conflict a stark aesthetic which dominates our visual memory of the war.” Hildebrand’s images thus stand out with their almost unreal-looking vividness, a result achieved not simply by his use of color film, but by his relatively long experience with a still fairly new medium. It was not until 1916 that a British photographer was allowed on the Western Front.” But among his countrymen, only Hildebrand took pictures in color. The British military authorities lagged behind. ![]() Grant in World War I: The Definitive Visual History. “Some 50 photographers were embedded with its forces, compared with 35 for the French. “In 1914, Germany was the world technical leader in photography and had the best grasp of its propaganda value,” writes R.G. We owe these shots to the efforts of German photographer Hans Hildebrand, as well as to his country’s already-established appreciation for the art and adeptness in engineering its tools. That color photography exists of anything in mid-1910s Europe, much less as momentous and disastrous a period as World War I, still surprises some people. Priestly, like looking at color photos from the front. But nothing brings home the detailed reality of this ever-more-distant “huge murderous public folly,” in the words of J.B. Of the countless volumes available, I personally recommend Geoff Dyer’s The Missing of the Somme. We can compensate for the century between us and the Great War by reading up on it, of course. The second half of the year 1914 saw a series of interrelated crises, responses, counter-crises, and counter responses that, these hundred years on, few of us could cite off the top of our heads. Yet as military historians often remind us, no one event can really start a conflict of that unprecedented scale any more than one event can stop it. We also know that the spark of the killing ignited the international geopolitical tinderbox just waiting to flame into the First World War. ![]() Most of us know this - or at least if we don’t know the exact date, we know it happened in 1914, 100 years ago. ![]() On June 28, 1914, Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |